JSC Petitioned to Review Conduct of Issack Hassan and Ombati Omwanza Over Impartiality

The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) has been petitioned to urgently review the conduct of its Vice Chairperson Isaac Rutto and Commissioner Omwanza Ombati over serious concerns about their impartiality and adherence to ethical standards.

The Consumer Federation of Kenya (COFEK) submitted a formal letter to JSC Chairperson Martha Koome on January 27, 2026, calling for an immediate examination of the two officials' actions. The petition highlights potential breaches of constitutional principles, statutory requirements for state officers, and the standards of integrity, impartiality, and public accountability outlined in Chapter Six of the Constitution.

A major issue raised involves Vice Chairperson Isaac Rutto's attendance at the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) National Governing Council meeting held at State House in Nairobi. This event, described as overtly partisan, has drawn significant public scrutiny and sparked widespread debate on social media. Critics argue that a senior JSC official participating in such a political gathering crosses an ethical boundary and threatens judicial independence. Social media users have pointed out that constitutional principles require any commissioner with political ambitions to step aside from the JSC. The petition stresses that even the appearance of partisan alignment by a JSC member could undermine public confidence in the commission's impartiality, especially while the JSC handles sensitive judicial interviews and nominations under Article 172 of the Constitution.

The petition also targets Commissioner Omwanza Ombati, alleging bias during a recent interview process for judges of the Court of Appeal. Credible information suggests that a sitting Court of Appeal judge, who was a candidate, may have been adversely treated in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. This alleged mistreatment is reportedly linked to a prior judicial decision that was unfavorable to Ombati. COFEK noted that it does not represent the affected judicial officer and that no formal complaint has been lodged by the individual. However, the federation emphasized that the integrity of the judicial appointments process remains a matter of immense public interest. If confirmed, such conduct would violate the common law principle of nemo judex in causa sua, meaning no one should be a judge in their own cause.

COFEK urged the JSC to thoroughly investigate these matters to determine whether the conduct falls below the constitutional threshold required of JSC members. The federation specifically called for Ombati to consider temporary recusal from future judicial interviews pending the review. It offered to provide supporting evidence and sought transparent clarification from the commissioner. The petition referenced relevant legal frameworks, including Articles 10, 73, 75, 232, 47, 50, and 172 of the Constitution, as well as the Leadership and Integrity Act, the Public Officer Ethics Act, and the Judicial Service Act.

The consumer watchdog stressed that prompt and transparent handling of the concerns would help reinforce public trust in the judiciary and the JSC's role in safeguarding judicial independence. No immediate response from the JSC, Chairperson Koome, Vice Chairperson Rutto, or Commissioner Ombati has been reported regarding the petition.

This development comes amid ongoing discussions about accountability and ethics within Kenya's judicial oversight bodies.